Your Random Video Of The Day

( h/t to Cessna @ http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2009/03/morning_awesome_492.html )

Nuggets Of Win : Part III

George W. Bush is just like Batman? Really?

Actually, Dick Cheney does sound like "The Penguin".

But that just wouldn't fit into Andrew Klavan's textual handjob to George W. Bush.

There seems to me no question that the Batman film "The Dark Knight," currently breaking every box office record in history, is at some level a paean of praise to the fortitude and moral courage that has been shown by George W. Bush in this time of terror and war. Like W, Batman is vilified and despised for confronting terrorists in the only terms they understand. Like W, Batman sometimes has to push the boundaries of civil rights to deal with an emergency, certain that he will re-establish those boundaries when the emergency is past

The main point that Klavan uses is that, in the film, Batman uses illegal surveillance to find The Joker and his henchmen. What Klavan doesn't seem to realize is that the two are not equivalent, but mutually exclusive.

Batman had actual and reliable intelligence that The Joker was in Gotham and was prepared to have the surveillance equipment destroyed when the job was done. Bush's position was slightly different, to put it mildly.


And there's so much more that happened this year, and the bulk of it happened close to Novemeber:

It's the crazy lady from the McCain "townhall":



Oh, oh, oh.............can we get the cool MTV, John Woo, action film angle on this?



This next one was so incredible, I almost couldn't believe it was happening.

Michelle Malkin got her knickers in a twist when Dunkin Donuts spokesperson, the every lovely Rachel Ray, wore a scarf that offended her delicate sensibilities:

Sigh. You all know I’ve been a fan of Dunkin Donuts for quite some time–and have touted their strong position in favor of immigration enforcement.

Charles Johnson notes, and many readers have e-mailed about, Dunkin Donuts’ spokeswoman Rachel Ray’s clueless sporting of a jihadi chic keffiyeh in a recent DD ad campaign. I’m hoping her hate couture choice was spurred more by ignorance than ideology.

A terrorist scarf?!



If you care to take a glance through the comments section of the thread in question, you'll get a first hand look at some interesting interactions I had with the lunatic fringe who would likely see the face of evil in an Old Navy fleece pullover if Malkin told them to.

The Wall Street Journal Has Gone Batty, Seriously

It certainly didn't take long for The Wall Street Journal to start loosing is credibility once Rupert "NewsCorp" Murdock bought it.

Here's an excerpt from Andrew Klavan's op-ed piece entitled:

What Bush and Batman Have in Common

There seems to me no question that the Batman film "The Dark Knight," currently breaking every box office record in history, is at some level a paean of praise to the fortitude and moral courage that has been shown by George W. Bush in this time of terror and war. Like W, Batman is vilified and despised for confronting terrorists in the only terms they understand. Like W, Batman sometimes has to push the boundaries of civil rights to deal with an emergency, certain that he will re-establish those boundaries when the emergency is past.

I think I just threw-up in my mouth a little. Are you fuckin kidding me?

This is the second time this week that someone has used Batman as a political tool of the conservative-right.

I wrote about the first one here.

Is this the new "talking point", use super-hero movies and there "themes" in conjuction with the Republican party and the alleged "War On Terror"?

Holy convolution Batman!!!!!

How To Read WAY Too Much Into The New Batman Movie

Kyle Smith over at PajamasMedia must use his lower intestines as storage space for all the wild inferences and over-reaching meanings that he likes to attach to things.

That being said, Mr. Smith has just reached up into his ass and came out with this, the subtitle for his latest piece on PajamasMedia's website:

Who would have guessed that the latest Batman movie would have a conservative point of view?

After containing my laughter and cleaning up the coffee I just spat all over my desk, I re-read his article and was literally astounded by how clueless Kyle is about movies in general, Batman in specific.

I've quoted the later half of Smith's ill-informed piece on Batman here to show you where he dives straight off the edge:

There is no pretending necessary to fear the Joker (Heath Ledger, in a role that is already a screen landmark). It is said of the Joker that “Some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.”

How to deal with such a figure? There is no easy answer, and here is where The Dark Knight strikes me as a conservative movie.

Liberals live in a world of “and.” Full security and full civil liberties. Universal health care and the best quality with no waiting. A dynamic economy and full welfare and unemployment benefits. Liberals, in other words, live in that scene in Spider-Man in which Spidey, forced to choose between saving a tram car full of innocent civilians and saving his girlfriend, chooses both. Liberals live in a fantasy.

Conservatives, though, live in a world of tradeoffs, of either/or. For having this relationship with reality, conservatives are caricatured as grumpy, stingy and negative. Surely all it takes is a bump in taxes on the wealthy and everything will be affordable? Where’s the Hope? Where’s the Dream? Yes, we can!

The Dark Knight lives on a razor edge of tradeoffs. In the coin flips of Harvey “Two-Face” Dent there is a message that not only can’t you choose both heads and tails, but sometimes you’re up against a trick coin that ensures you lose either way.

Innocents get killed, civil liberties are infringed, and Batman ardently defends lies over truth in the pursuit of propaganda. Extremism in the defense of liberty is Batman’s virtue, and he ventures much farther into the wilds of lawlessness than any politician would dare. Moreover, his Gotham is a place where some believe that chaos can be managed, that giving into a simple demand from the Joker that Batman turn himself in might be a workable alternative in the long run.

Despite his name, the Joker doesn’t really seem crazy. Perhaps listening to him is a better option than a war that will have untold costs for everyone. “I like this job,” the Joker says on one of his many missions of conflagration, reminding us why his type will always be around. The future looks like it may bring a lot more Jokers than Batmen. “I’m not a monster,” the Joker tells Batman. “I’m just ahead of the curve.”

How can Smith possibly speak about Batman's ventures into lawlessness and even equate that with modern conservativism? The two couldn't be more diametrically opposed if you wanted them to be.

True, Bruce Wayne grew up in a world of privilege, of power, of his every want and desire being provided to him. Though this is generally the seed, the catalyst from which most conservatives are born, Bruce Wayne - as Batman - is nothing like a conservative.

He protects the innocent, and defends the freedoms that modern conservative politicians are attempting to usurp every chance they get. Wayne used his corporate ties to sieze control of the empire that his father built in order to prevent it from falling into the hands of the corrupt.

How is this "conservative"?

Batman is as much a conservative as he is a liberal. The character cannot be classified as either, as he has removed himself from a society that overtly eager to define things in such narrow terms.

If there is one thing that Mr. Smith is correct in stating, it's that conservatives live in a world of "trade-offs". They will trade another's well-being in order for themselves to be comfortable. They will trade away their individuality in order to be part of the collectively ignorant masses, all for the sake of acceptance.


If Liberals live in the alleged "and" world, it is so that we can see things together like "security" and "freedom", "blacks" and "whites" co-existing, and we are certainly able to see the difference between "the truth" and "lies".


Truth-be-told, I haven't seen the new Batman movie, yet. But, if there's one thing I do know, it's that Kyle Smith's ill-informed opinion is blatantly obvious and makes him appear as stupid on the internet as he probably is in real life.