Someone reall needs to get John Boehner a "wambulence".
Don't you just love the way that conservative Republicans continually talk about all these great ideas, and great plans, and how their version of healthcare reform is so much better, yet they can't enunciate any of these. It's far easier for them to slam a bill that THEY haven't read. It's far easier for them to talk about something that they have never wanted to be a part of by making false claims about what is in the bill that THEY haven't read. It's like commenting on a film that you haven't watched.
It turns out that there are actually serveral components of the proposed legislation that conservatives have been talking about doing, but it was the Democrats that actually did.
- Deficit Neutral
- Reduces Longterm Costs
- Coverage Across State Lines
- Malpractice Reform
- Allowing Children To Remain On Parents Plans
- No Public Funds For Abortions
- Small Business Protections
- Wellness Programs
Having started reading the bill today, I can assure you that the pages are read rather quickly. But yes, it is quite lengthy - as is ALL legislation that comes from Congress. So, it's a bit of a disingenuous statement for Boehner to whine like a little girl with a skinned knee, saying it's not fair that he has to read it.
Naturally, the healthcare refom bill is going to be massive in size due to the fact that massive reforms are required. It's not like you can have comprehensive and realistic changes in just 7 pages.
A Blog Version Of The Inside Of My Head. The place where politics, film, the media, music, pop culture, and random topics collide in an orgy of neo-philisophical randomness that would make your mother scream.
Showing posts with label Congressman Darrel Issa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congressman Darrel Issa. Show all posts
Friday, October 30, 2009
Thursday, March 26, 2009
REGULATORS!!!!! Mount Up
Not sure if I would attribute that title to Warren G and Nate Dogg or The Young Guns movie.
Let's just get to the story, and then you'll know what I mean by my title.
More from Ben Smith @ Politico
That's right, no oversight for banks, for companies like AIG, or reform of the health-care industry. Republicans want to have control over Michelle Obama.
Yes, I know they are claiming that this is not about her, but who do they think they are fooling?
Let's just get to the story, and then you'll know what I mean by my title.
House Republicans are pressing for a change in federal law that could force Michelle Obama and future first ladies to do more of their policy work in public. But Democrats warn President Obama may take the attempt personally “as an attack on his wife.”
The GOP effort is being led by the ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), whose initial salvo was rebuffed recently at a contentious committee markup session. Under Issa’s amendment, any government policy group that Mrs. Obama or another first spouse regularly participates in would be subject to a law requiring meetings to be announced in advance and, in most instances, public.
More from Ben Smith @ Politico
That's right, no oversight for banks, for companies like AIG, or reform of the health-care industry. Republicans want to have control over Michelle Obama.
Yes, I know they are claiming that this is not about her, but who do they think they are fooling?
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
How Fast Can A Lie Travel From Disneyland To Vegas?
And how quickly can it be knocked down?
Good on you Shuster
Good on you Shuster
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)