I had a friend on Facebook ask me this morning how anyone - regardless of political stripe - can determine whom reads what.
Do only Leftists read Marx?
Do only people on the Right read Ayn Rand?
While considering ways to approach this topic, I was reminded of David Fincher's film Seven - particularly the scene where Morgan Freeman employs the skills of an FBI friend who can get him a list of books checked out by people in the New York area. This list is of "flagged" text like Mien Kampf, one the books on Loughner's "favorites" list from his YouTube page.
In the scene, Brad Pitt's character mentions that they could end up catching a college kid doing a research project. To me, that rang true when looking through Loughner's list. Not in so much as I thought he was trying to learn from texts by Plato, Orwell, or Marx - as he is almost certainly not interesting in the actual context of these works so much as he is searching for validation.
But the question still stands - if you walked into someone's home and glanced over at their bookshelf and saw books on Communism, books on the possible cover-up of events prior and leading up to Sept. 11th 2001, as works by Mark Twain, Ayn Rand, and Glenn Beck would you be able to determine whether or not they were aligned politically Left or Right?
Most certainly not.
What is evident from the reactions of pundit, journalists, and even the average citizen in America that is actively following the continually unfolding events surrounding Loughner is that they either have little interesting in learning about him and what transpired between his first meeting with Rep. Giffords in 2007 and his assassination attempt last Saturday, or they are wanting to know everything about those years and those prior.
As much as many on the Left are far too focused on making this simply about Palin, those on the Right are equally as - if not more - guilty of making themselves the "victims" while ignoring Loughner's motives.
It is true that books hold power, but it's a power that can be used for good or for evil. Highlighting the Communist Manifesto as proof positive that Loughner was a Leftist is pure folly without careful consideration and analysis of all the elements that surround what happened before to Loughner before he pulled the trigger.
A Blog Version Of The Inside Of My Head. The place where politics, film, the media, music, pop culture, and random topics collide in an orgy of neo-philisophical randomness that would make your mother scream.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(141)
-
▼
January
(47)
- Because Of Who They Are
- Palinisms In Polling
- Reaganisms
- On This Day In Reactionary History
- The Bonnaroo List : Pt. III
- A Question Of Leadership
- The Modern American Right Hates Kids
- Foxes Targeting The Captain, Again
- Floating The Understudy
- The SCOTUS And The SOTU
- A Teaching Moment
- Constitutionally Speaking
- Who's To Decide
- Relevant Quote Of The Moment b/w Prophecy In Song
- Let's Talk About Me
- Shaping The Study
- A New Form Of "Truther" Is Born
- You People Could Learn From That
- An Injection Of Race And Reagan
- The Bonnaroo List: Pt. II
- Steeping The Spin
- For The Intellectually Impaired
- The Bonnaroo List
- Defending The Tan Man
- No, Please, Keep It Up
- Some Thoughts On The Loughner Timeline
- Caribou Barbie's Sermon - or - Palin Just Agreed W...
- Shark, You Have Been Jumped - Again
- A Tale Of Two Arizona Sheriffs
- What Do You Read?
- Because He Knows
- Independent Voices
- Placing Blame And Absent Accountability
- Their Own Tactics Against Them
- And So It Begins
- No Narrative Too Ridiculous
- Bring In The Jew Special Effects Team
- Holding A Mirror Up To Contextual Edits
- The Reality Of Box Office Revenue Decline
- The Dangers Of Over-Simplification
- Thoughts On The GOP Gameplan : As Of Today
- Wholesale Misinformation
- Lessons In Conservative History
- Dumbest Quote Of 2010
- Acceptance of Ignorance
- The Conservative Minor League
- Pete Postlethwaite 1946 - 2011
-
▼
January
(47)
No comments:
Post a Comment