Michelle vs. Michelle

Has anyone else noticed that since being booted as a fill-in host on O'Reilly's program that Malkin has become increasingly more and more - how does she put it - unhinged?



Despite Malkin's hamfisted efforts in showing that Michelle Obama had something to do with the AmeriCorps IG, she, the President, and the White Housenot involved in firing Gerald Walpin.

The firing "would not have played itself out" were it not for the fact that the board raised concerns about the IG, Gerald Walpin, after the May 20 board meeting, a board member told TPMmuckraker. The board member added that the White House had no role in encouraging the board to make the review request, calling it "completely board-initiated." The White House had cited the request from the board in its letter to Congress explaining the reason for Walpin's firing.

But would you or anyone expect Malkin to approach her subject matter any other way that with her continually mouth-agape prattling? If there is one thing that she is at least moderately good at, it is connecting two divergent dots in order to validate the voices in her head that continually tell her she is right and everyone is wrong.

I'll play devil's advocate for a second and postulate this - what if Walpin was fired for "political" reasons? Would this be any different than the mass AG firings by the Bush administration? If true, this wouldn't make it any better, but Malkin's whinge and shriek doesn't lend the story any credibility.