Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Candidacy Vs. Needs Of Constituancy

As opportunists go, Louisana Governor Bobby Jindal is shaping-up to be one of the best this year.

Congresswoman Debbie Asserman-Schultz takes Jindal to task over his statements that he would pass on accepting unemployment from the Economc Stimulus:

As the congressman representing parts of Lousiana devastated by Hurricane Katrina, Jindal actively sought assistance from the federal government. Yesterday on MSNBC’s Countdown, Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) called the Republican Party a “heartless and insensitive organization” and criticized Jindal for rejecting the unemployment funds. Jindal, she noted, was singing a different tune about unemployment aid when Katrina hit his district:

WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ: This is a guy, who while I served with him in Congress, voted for that [unemployment] assistance twice, and is certainly willing to take funding from the federal when people are out of a job and out of their home as a result of a hurricane, but not willing to take that assistance when his constituents are out of a job and out of a home as a result of this economic crisis. I’m not sure what the difference is. A crisis is a crisis.




Goernor Jindal is apparently forsaking the population of the state he was tasked with representing in favour of not only a failed ideology, but of beginning his campaign for the Presidency.

No comments:

Post a Comment

So, you want to leave a comment? Well, I moderate all my comments but don't edit or delete any. So, be warned that if you leave an ignorant or just plain idiotic comment you will be taken to the town-square where all can freely throw flaming, rotten tomatoes at you. Carry-on then.