This could have been any within the conservative talk-radio realm. And now that it's out there, you are sure to hear more of it.
More here.
In terms of a classic example of a "contextual" uber-right-wing conservative taking only a portion of a scientific study to ham-fistedly make a point, this is pretty much it.
Mark Levin is doing what he, and all like him, do best. They are arming their audience with just enough information to win a debate rather than have a complete picture of what they are discussing.
There is, after all, a vast difference between winning a debate and being correct. This is how people like Levin have operated since conservative talk-radio began. All you have to do is cite a portion of something legitimate, speak as loudly as you can, and use as many adjectives and catch-phrases as possible.
This is nothing more than arming the ignorant with ignorance.
No comments:
Post a Comment
So, you want to leave a comment? Well, I moderate all my comments but don't edit or delete any. So, be warned that if you leave an ignorant or just plain idiotic comment you will be taken to the town-square where all can freely throw flaming, rotten tomatoes at you. Carry-on then.